SJ 2020: Will districts work together?
Mayor Chuck Reed and Santa Clara County Superintendent Chuck Weis are betting that an appeal for collaboration, a moral imperative and a hint of money will work where the iron fist of No Child Left Behind law hasn’t. Here’s hoping they’re right.
Weis and Reed are the instigators of SJ2020, an initiative to see that all students in San Jose are proficient at grade level by the end of the next decade. Last Thursday, a handful of superintendents, college presidents, charter school leaders and non-profit executives were among the 300 people at City Hall to pledge their efforts.
No Child Left Behind demands that all children be proficient in English language arts and math by 2014. There’s been incremental progress — but, with five years to go, at least 40,000 students — and probably closer to 60,000 or more than 40 percent of San Jose’s children — aren’t at grade level.
Most of these are low-income, Hispanic children, many of them learning English. While 85 percent of Asian-American children are proficient in academic skills, only 41 percent of Hispanics are — a gap of 44 percentage points.No Child Left Behind has sanctions to try to force change. Reed and Weis technically are powerless to drive it. The mayor has no express power over schools, and the county superintendent, while responsible for overseeing financially troubled districts, can’t tell school boards how to run their affairs. And they also don’t have any extra money to offer — at least initially — although they do have the stature of their offices to bring people together.
Reed and Weis want San Jose to become the first large urban area to eradicate the achievement gap. Making that happen will take a lot more cooperation among don’t-tread-on-me school districts.
San Jose has 19 districts, from San Jose Unified, covering about a quarter of the city, to one-school Luther Burbank. This fragmentation, with six K-8 districts feeding East Side Union High School District, has hampered creation of a city-wide strategy. Big foundations, like Gates, aren’t interested in working with such small districts, and corporate philanthropies are often frustrated in having to deal with so many of them. (That’s the value of my sponsor, Silicon Valley Education Foundation, which runs summer school in algebra for multiple districts.)
Weis and Reed are hoping that all organizations that work with kids will come together to identify gaps in services, such as after-school and pre-school programs, commit to high standards and then adopt successful academic programs and share best practices. Charter school operators — Downtown College Prep, KIPP, Rocketship Education and ACE Charter Schools — are anxious to, but it’s unclear how active many districts will be. Most superintendents have yet to take the pledge, and East Side Union High School District, distracted by the suspension of its superintendent, didn’t participate in the planning. It has half of the city’s high school students.
For now, SJ 2020 will rely on two Chucks’ leadership and will run on a Two-Buck Chuck budget.
The next step will be to launch nine workgroups, which include school readiness, parent involvement, college and career preparation, community partnerships and extended learning time. (Update: You can now find out all about the initiative at the county office web site and sign up for updates and to join the effort .)
One issue that needs consensus: What will be the measurement of college/career readiness for high school students? State standardized tests are a fine measure for elementary and middle school but not for high school. The high school exit exam is too low a standard. Should it be the A to G course requirements needed to get into a CSU or UC school, which San Jose Unified has adopted but other districts have not?
With all districts, the city and non-profits crying poverty, there’ll be no promises of new money, at least initially. And there’s no provision under state law to permit a city to create a tax for education — not that it’s even been discussed. But an initiative led by a mayor and county superintendent may help in the competition for philanthropic, corporate and federal money; there’s talk about pursuing a Race to the Top innovation grant next year.
For now, SJ 2020 will rely on two Chucks’ leadership and will run on a Two-Buck Chuck budget. But it’s important to raise the public’s awareness of the tremendous disparities in student achievement in the state’s third largest city and to persuade 19 superintendents to work together to end them. The first step has been taken.






It even happened in this blog! As the Founder, President/Executive Director of the California Alliance of African American Educators (CAAAE) and a member of State Superintendent Jack O’Connell’s P-16 Council charged with helping close the state’s racial achievement gap, I was deeply disturbed at last week’s SJ 2020 Launch because there was not one person who looked like me speaking from the agenda yet it was an initiative about our children, too. Leon Beauchman, president of the Santa Clara County Alliance of Black Educators, declined an opportunity to speak at the end of the launch because he felt like he was an afterthought. He had not been involved in the planning and had only learned of the initiative a few weeks earlier, yet he is one of Chuck Weis’ bosses as a member of the Board of Directors of the Santa Clara County Office of Education! I spoke to a number of African American leaders who were at the launch and we all felt marginalized just as our children are marginalized in these schools. This blog reinforced how truly invisible we are as a people in San Jose and in Silicon Valley. I am disappointed that John emphasized that the majority of the students to be impacted by this initiative are Latino. Those children definitely deserve to get special services and their numbers are large, but do not leave out children of African descent. By some estimates, 43% of African American students drop out of high school annually in CA. Of those male drop-outs, 60% will end up in prison before the age of 30. Is that a population that deserves our attention or what??!! If San Jose is to close the racial achievement gap by 2020, we must include ALL children residing in it.
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
I maintain that the achievement gap is a manufactured educational smokescreen designed to keep the testing companies and consultants in business. Measure kids using the yardstick of creative thinking and you will find no such gap. Yes, there are deficiencies, but as long as districts continue to operate the same way and expect different results, insanity will continue to reign. In classroom performance I see less of a “gap” than what is being publicized. But continue to supersize schools and overcrowd classrooms and run budgets on “two buck Chuck” finances and see how much motivation there will be for them to do well. And as long as the curriculum remains uninspiring and rote, kids the drop out rate will continue to climb. Let’s face it, education reform is more, much more, than solving a contrived and distorted “achievement gap.
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity