Bill would expand who could grant a teaching credential
Jumping ahead of the expected release today of the Assembly’s version of Race to the Top legislation, Republican Assemblyman Brian Nestande of Palm Desert has introduced three bills of his own.
Two deal with alternative ways to bring teachers into the profession. The third would make it slightly easier to get rid of those who end up performing badly.
At Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s urging, legislators are considering ways that might improve the state’s shot at a piece of the U.S. Department of Education’s $4.35 billion Race to the Top competition. Nestande’s bills would tangentially address what Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has targeted as the biggest priority of Race to the Top funding: ways to improve teacher performance.
ABX5-5 would create the biggest change. It would enable non-traditional organizations – business groups or charter schools, perhaps – to begin awarding teacher credentials, just as California Start University campuses do.
University education departments have been broadly criticized for mediocre credentialing programs. So one can make a case for alternative programs for attracting candidates to teaching – especially those entering the profession mid-career. In additon, charter school organizations may want to train their own teachers with different values and skills. (High Tech High, a charter management organization in San Diego, already does run its own credentialing program.)
But rather than greatly allowing new credentialing organizations, some of which may be equally mediocre, the Legislature may want to experiment more narrowly. It may take a cue from outside organizations that push for the bill’s passage – assuming there are any.
ABX5-6 would expand another non-traditional route to teaching: a rarely used “eminence” credential given to those who have demonstrated professional achievements in the subject area in which they plan to teach. An example might be an acclaimed physicist who wants to teach high school physics. An eminence credential is a way around having to spend a year taking university courses to get a teaching credential. The state Commission on Teacher Credentialing can award these credentials; the bill would allow county offices of education to do so as well.
There is a need to attact more professionals from the business world into teaching. However, it’s also critical that prospective teachers understand what they’re getting into and know how to teach a diverse student population. It’s not clear that broadly expanding the eminence credential is the right option.
AB X5-7 would delve into the problematic area of evaluating teachers. Teachers currently can be fired for poor performance, although it’s been hard and expensive, because of litigation, for districts to make the case. This bill would allow districts to use student test results as a basis for setting a professional improvement plan as part of an unsatisfactory job evaluation. A subsequent failure to meet those improvement goals would be a criterion for dismissal.






Are these bills regarded as having any chance of being passed by the Legislature? It seems to me they are likely to draw a lot of opposition.
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
Mike: I would think any change to the ed code dealing with teacher terminations would be DOA.
I wonder why the eminence exception needs to be expanded. Outside experts in the sciences and other fields already can be hired to teach part-time without a credential, as long as they are under the supervision of a credentialed teacher. I didn’t realize this until this week. I wonder why more districts aren’t taking advantage of this option already.
Expanding credentialing agencies has come up before — and met resistance. But the Legislative Analyst’s Office has also suggested this as a reform that would improve the state’s chances of getting a Race to the Top grant. It deserves serious consideration.
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
It would be great if teacher credentialing would be simplified. But the unions won’t allow it. Not only do you have to spend a year taking classes, but you have to spend a year doing student teaching – none of which is paid, all of which you have to pay to do. Then you still have to take multiple exams that are ridiculous in content. If teacher credentialing were easier – say you could teach in the area where you have your college degree without an additional exam and could do internships where you are paid less, but still paid (instead of a year of classes and a year of student teaching) more people would become teachers and you might get better teachers because they are not turned off by the credentialing process.
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity