Fewer districts follow through with MOU

By John Fensterwald - Educated Guess

A few stragglers may yet come it, but fewer than half of the 800 charter schools and school districts that had expressed interest in Race to the Top have ended up signing a Memorandum of Understanding committing to participate in the state’s competition for a piece of the $4.3 billion federal program.

The state Department of Education reported 346 MOUs were in as of 11 a.m. Saturday. Many of these were individual charter schools.  However, school boards in 10 of the 30 biggest districts in the state did vote to join, and they alone comprise  19 percent — 1,170,000 — of the state’s 6.2 million students. Los Angeles Unified, the largest with 687,000 students, was joined by Long Beach Unified (2nd with 88,000) and Fresno (fourth with 77,000). Among those reported not signing MOUs: San Diego, San Francisco, Elk Grove, Stockton, Riverside and San Jose unified districts.

What the state hadn’t reported yet was the number of local teachers unions that signed the MOUs, too. A state spokeswoman would say only that there were “more than a few.”

There might have been a lot more, but the California Teachers Assn. last week urged bargaining units not to do the MOU. And its opposition may have scared off some school boards. Another factor is that the state released its formal summary of what it intends to do with the money only last week.

The deadline for districts was Friday afternoon, so that the state could complete its application by the Jan 19 deadline.

5 Comments

  1. It is my understanding that the California School Boards Association came out against signing the MOU prior to CTA opposing it. This may have impacted some boards.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  2. I think you have your facts incorrect. Here is a link http://www.caracetothetop.org/cs/rttt/print/htdocs/intent.htm. So far it seems 745 LEAs have turned in MOUs, including San Francisco, Elk Grove, and San Jose.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  3. With respect to the comment by Adam Hampton: CSBA did not advise its members against signing the RTTT Memorandum of Understanding. The advisory that was sent to all CSBA members (which is posted on the CSBA Web site) recommended that governance teams work closely together to ensure that their district would benefit from participating, and identified the key issues that boards needed to consider in making that determination. CSBA will be sending a letter of support for the State’s RTTT application.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

"Darn, I wish I had read that over again before I hit send.” Don’t let this be your lament. To promote a civil dialogue, please be considerate, respectful and mindful of your tone. We encourage you to use your real name, but if you must use a nom de plume, stick with it. Anonymous postings will be removed.

10.1Assessments(37)
2010 elections(16)
2012 election(16)
A to G Curriculum(27)
Achievement Gap(38)
Adequacy suit(19)
Adult education(1)
Advocacy organizations(20)
Blog info(5)
CALPADS(32)
Career academies(20)
CELDT(2)
Character education(2)
Charters(82)
Common Core standards(71)
Community Colleges(66)
Data(25)
Did You Know(16)
Disabilities education(3)
Dropout prevention(11)
© Thoughts on Public Education 2013 | Home | Terms of Use | Site Map | Contact Us