Protect higher ed for you own sake, boomers

By John Fensterwald - Educated Guess

If baby boomers need another persuasive reason  why it’s critically important to invest more now in higher education in California, they should consider this: They’ll need more workers with college degrees,  if they want to make  money selling their homes in the next 20 years.

University of Southern California demography professor Dowell Myers made this pitch to self-interest Tuesday during the second hearing of the Joint Legislative Committee on the Master Plan for Higher Education. He and others  have warned about the coming threat to the state’s economy from a shortage of workers with college degrees.  Thirty-five percent of workers 55 to 59 years old have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared with 26 percent of workers aged 25 to 39.  Workers with a college degree earn on average 90 percent more than workers with a high school degree in California.

The Public Policy Institute of California has projected a shortage of 1 million workers without a bachelor’s degree in 2025. CEO Mark Baldassare said the state  won’t be able to close that gap, but it could cut it in half, with a three-prong effort to increase the percentage of high school graduates who go on to college, the transfer rate from community colleges, and the college graduation rate.

California will have to grow its own talent, because it will no longer be able to count on importing a surplus or workers from  other states. Quite the opposite, more Californians with college degrees are leaving the state than coming in. The state will continue to draw skilled foreign workers, but not enough to fill the need, Baldassare said.

California is 18th in the nation in the percentage of population with a bachelor  or associate degree, Baldassare said; 56 percent of high school grads go directly to college, compared with 62 percent nationally.

In order to increase the college completion rate, students need the right classes in the right sequences in the right time, said Henry Powell, chairman of the UC Academic Senate. Instead, with budget  cuts, students are getting shut out of classes they need – or they’re not getting being admitted to a state university.  The California State University’s 23 campuses have reduced admissions by 40,000; the University of California by 2,300. And 200,000 students in community college are not finding the classes they need.

Demographics will compound the problem. For the past 50 years, there have been 20 to 21 senior citizens (age 65 or over) per 100 working residents. By 2030, the ratio will shift to 37 seniors per 100 workers, Myers said. There will be serious revenue and policy implications for the state and the nation – and the real estate market that seniors are counting for a nest egg  to hatch their retirement.

Soon after housing prices stabilize following the current recession, prices could erode again as baby boomers unload their houses, creating a buyer’s market. Seniors’  best hope is for an educated workforce to  prop up prices, Myers said,  noting that Latino home buyers with a college degree buy homes priced an average of 64 percent higher.

Expanded access to higher education is more important today than at any time in California’s history, Myers testified, and it “benefits the older generation at least as much as it does young people.”

1 Comment

  1. I agree with this article and have been doing everything I can do to make sure that my kids get a good education and go on to college. I have a son who is a Sophomore in High School and a daughter in the 5th grade. They are both attending college-prep public schools in districts that are recognized as the “highest” in California and where the majority of parents are college educated. I am still spend approximately $1,000 per month on private tutors. Many other parents also use tutors, especially for math but other subjects as well. The bottom line is that even in the California’s top school districts parents have to spend a lot of extra money on education or spend hours volunteering or fundraising for schools. While I am seeing good results in my own children, I am worried for those students who do not attend school in a highly ranked district and who do not have college educated parents who can help them navigate the school system and support them financially. Needless to say, the family vacation, new automobiles, and any other non essential expenses have been cut to finance education. I don’t anticipate my education expenses to end for another 10+ years and in fact they will increase substantially in 3 years when my son starts college. When my son gets out of college my daughter will be starting and god bless us…. she wants to go to $tanford!

    While I am confident that this long term investment in education is necessary, the increase of education expense from my generation is 1000% or more. My parents sent me to school and that was that. I went to Cal and when I finished I had a student loan which was approximately $800. I have a Bachelors Degree, Masters Degree and am a CPA.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

"Darn, I wish I had read that over again before I hit send.” Don’t let this be your lament. To promote a civil dialogue, please be considerate, respectful and mindful of your tone. We encourage you to use your real name, but if you must use a nom de plume, stick with it. Anonymous postings will be removed.

10.1Assessments(35)
2010 elections(16)
2012 election(14)
A to G Curriculum(25)
Achievement Gap(35)
Adequacy suit(19)
Advocacy organizations(20)
Blog info(4)
CALPADS(31)
Career academies(18)
CELDT(1)
Character education(2)
Charters(81)
Common Core standards(69)
Community Colleges(60)
Data(25)
Did You Know(16)
Disabilities education(3)
Dropout prevention(10)
Education Excellence Committee(15)
© Thoughts on Public Education 2012 | Home | Terms of Use | Site Map | Contact Us