Charters edged out in L.A.


A six-month stab at school competition with nationwide interest ended Tuesday when Los Angeles Unified school board members turned control of more schools to groups of teachers than Superintendent Ramon Cortines had recommended. There will certainly  be an injection of experimentation in schools organized by unionized teachers as a result– but also fewer quality charter schools than had been predicted in August when the trustees opened up 12 low-performing schools and 18 new schools to bids by outside groups.

United Teachers Los Angeles, which has seen a decline in membership and could lose hundreds more teachers to layoffs next fall, lobbied hard to keep the 30 schools under its control. In the end, board members gave union-affiliated teachers 22 of the 30 campuses, with four new schools turned over to charters and three to Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s non-profit Partnership for Los Angeles Schools.

The board’s decision to shut out three of the city’s respected charter school outfits – Alliance College-Ready Public Schools and  Green Dot Public Schools from sharing five small schools at the new Esteban Torres High School, and ICEF (Inner City Education Foundation Public Schools)  from sharing the campus at the new Barack Obama Global Prep – frustrated  charter advocates. Jed Wallace, CEO of the California Charter Schools Association, said in a statement that “the supporters of the status quo and adult concerns trump(ed) making good decisions on the behalf of children.”

Ben Austin, an organizer for the group Parent Revolution, was more blunt in an e-mail: “Parents are going to take back and transform their schools by any means necessary because they only get one chance to give their kids the education they deserve.”

If anyone is worrying about bloodshed on the streets, Austin is talking about the metaphorical “parent trigger” ­– the law that the Legislature passed last month allowing a majority of parents to petition local school trustees  to turn around their struggling school. One option, which some parent groups will demand, is to invite in a charter school, though the board has the final say. Within a few months, Los Angeles may see the first petition.

Los Angeles Unified’s public school choice motion is designed to create innovation through competition. That will happen in some of the 30 schools, where teacher groups, threatened with a loss of jobs, came up with interesting plans. But charter participation is the leverage to make change happen. Whether the board’s vote shutting out some of the charters will discourage more from applying in the next round remains an open question.


  1. my guess is that we have not heard the last from the charter groups on this – unfortunately what’s missing in the conversation is any information on what I would guess are some pretty good ideas developed by the teachers on how to improve these schools. Whether they will really get the support and resources they need to do the job, or whether it will be business as usual remains to be seen. John

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  2. Parent Revolution (an astroturf organization created by charter operators, not an actual parent group) defines a failing school as API 744 or below, based on the schools that it targeted for takeover efforts. By that definition (API 744 or below), 14 out of 15 Green Dot schools are failing.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  3. I am disapppointed that parents voices was not heard over all Aspire parents from Huntington Park that came out to support Aspire to be a school in South Gate. When do Huntington Park or any others parents decide what happen in another City. There was only one parents from South Gate spoke up for Aspire .In the community advisory votes in South Gate Aspire got least votes from employee and parents. I asked, myself if this action was a school a give away to Bill Gate and Eli and friends, and all policticans in Southeast area The Aspire Applicant have no parents and community member as guide linde for Public Choices. Yet, Huntington Park residents was able to speak on what best for South Gate.

    Mary Johnson

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

"Darn, I wish I had read that over again before I hit send.” Don’t let this be your lament. To promote a civil dialogue, please be considerate, respectful and mindful of your tone. We encourage you to use your real name, but if you must use a nom de plume, stick with it. Anonymous postings will be removed.

2010 elections(16)
2012 election(16)
A to G Curriculum(27)
Achievement Gap(38)
Adequacy suit(19)
Adult education(1)
Advocacy organizations(20)
Blog info(5)
Career academies(20)
Character education(2)
Common Core standards(71)
Community Colleges(66)
Did You Know(16)
Disabilities education(3)
Dropout prevention(11)
© Thoughts on Public Education 2015 | Home | Terms of Use | Site Map | Contact Us