Symantec Chairman calls for Prop 13 reform

By John Fensterwald - Educated Guess

This was not your typical after-dinner acceptance speech by a corporate honoree.

On receiving the Silicon Valley Education Foundation’s  annual Pioneer Business Leader Award last week, Symantec Corp. Board Chairman John Thompson called for reforming Proposition 13 to provide more money for public schools.

“No one wakes up every morning and says,  ‘I want to pay more taxes,’” Thompson told 600 people at the Foundation’s annual dinner in San Jose. But the insufficient funding of schools is a “core issue” that needs to be dealt with.

Proposition 13 limits taxes on real estate to 1 percent of a property’s assessed value. Because commercial property owners have found ways to sell their properties without triggering reassessment, there have been repeated calls recently for either raising the tax rates on business properties or assessing them regularly. AB 2492, by San Francisco Assemblyman Tom Ammiano would do the latter, under some conditions.

However, in his brief speech and in an interview the next day, Thompson said he is not advocating any specific changes to Prop 13. Instead, he advocates a general review of its impact and eventually a voter initiative to revise it.

Thompson is certainly not alone in attributing a gradual erosion of financial support to K-12 schools and state colleges and universities to the restrictions on property taxes by passage of Prop 13 in 1978. However, he is one of few business leaders to call for changing it. In my interview with him, Thompson also called for changing the requirement for a two-thirds vote of the Legislature to pass the state budget.

But Thompson also said that any additional money for schools must be accompanied by school reforms. To do one without the other would be “a waste.” Reform, he said, means “creating measurable, definable goals for students, teachers, administrators – everyone must have set of goals that can be well-established and well-rewarded when they are achieved.”

“Most importantly,” he said, “there must be punishment in this system for those who don’t contribute to the effort. We cannot afford to reward mediocrity.”

During his decade as CEO of Symantec, based in Mountain View,  sales of the security software company grew from $632 million to $6.2 billion, and its workforce grew to 17,000. Thompson also served on the national board of Teach For America.

Calling the state’s high school graduation rate “appalling,” Thompson, 60, the son of a postal worker and elementary school teacher, said, “Every child deserves a right to a good education, and every child in this country ought to have a chance in life just like the one I had.”

5 Comments

  1. I didn’t see much information on how Thompson wants to reform Prop 13. I see the angst over prop 13 as people looking over the fence and seeing their neighbor who purchased a home 30 years ago is not paying the same amount as he/she is because they bought their home 3 years ago. Sounds like we are punishing someone for buying a house at a much lower cost.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  2. Shirley,
    When someone purchases their home, there is a clear change of ownership and it triggers a reassessment. What’s been going on is that commercial property owners have found ways to buy property without a reassessment. That’s unfair to residential owners whether they’ve owned for 3 or 30 years.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  3. What Stacey said. The property tax burden now falls MUCH more heavily on homeowners today (vs businesses) than it did pre-prop.13; that’s why we need businesses to pay their fair share — iow why we need to close this loophole.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  4. What a crock………Oh, the schools are underfunded, let’s raise taxes……..Uh Huh, not hard to figure out where you came from………..Mr. Lefty…..
     
    If you’re talking about reforming Prop. 13, which was voted and passed by the PEOPLE………….
     
    How about reforming SPENDING in this State?  Our taxes are high enough already, if you have such a great Company, YOU can contribute more of YOUR money, quit trying to encourage the State to steal more of mine…….
     
    Cut out Welfare, lock down the Prison system, layoff 1,000’s of STATE workers, and Oh Yeah, while you’re at it, lay off the Legislature……Who needs all those people who WILL NOT do their jobs?  Or do you think issuing I.O.U.’s is funny?

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  5. Jimbo needs to go to some other website that might appreciate his blather.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

"Darn, I wish I had read that over again before I hit send.” Don’t let this be your lament. To promote a civil dialogue, please be considerate, respectful and mindful of your tone. We encourage you to use your real name, but if you must use a nom de plume, stick with it. Anonymous postings will be removed.

10.1Assessments(35)
2010 elections(16)
2012 election(14)
A to G Curriculum(25)
Achievement Gap(35)
Adequacy suit(19)
Advocacy organizations(20)
Blog info(4)
CALPADS(31)
Career academies(18)
CELDT(1)
Character education(2)
Charters(81)
Common Core standards(69)
Community Colleges(60)
Data(25)
Did You Know(16)
Disabilities education(3)
Dropout prevention(10)
Education Excellence Committee(15)
© Thoughts on Public Education 2012 | Home | Terms of Use | Site Map | Contact Us