Three decades of underfunding education

By John Fensterwald - Educated Guess

A new report by the California Budget Project – “Race to the Bottom? California’s Support for Schools Lags the Nation” – underscores what’s at stake in the coming battle  between Gov. Schwarzenegger and Democratic leaders on state education spending, a key difference in the stalemate over the state budget.

The report tracks 30 years of underfunding K-12 schools. Its conclusion: “The spending gap (between California and other states) widened after the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, narrowed from the late 1990s through 2001-02, and has grown substantially since 2006-07.”

Many of the data points on expenditures are familiar:

  • California ranked 44th among the 50 states in K-12 spending in 2009-10, according to the National Education Association’s calculations. (Education Week, which factors in cost of living, ranks California lower.)
  • California spent  $2,546 less per student than the rest of the nation in 2009-10. It would have to spend $15,4 billion more to reach the national average.
  • The state ranked anywhere between 46th and 50th in terms of the number of K-12 students per teacher, guidance counselor, librarian and administrator.

As Democrats and Republicans get ready to square off once again on new taxes, consider a key measure of effort, what the state spends relative to what it can afford. California ranked 46th in spending as a percentage of personal income, a measure that  reflects the size of  the state’s economy and wealth. In 2008-09, it devoted 3.28 percent  of personal income to K-12 schools, nearly 1 percentage point less than the national average of 4.25 percent. That’s the widest gap in 30 years – a reflection of how hard California’s been whacked in the current recession.

But with the exception of 2001-02, when spending in California  spent 3.9 percent of personal income – 2 tenths percent behind the nation – California has always substantially lagged other states. The height of state spending was 1971-72, at 4 percent of personal income (4.5 percent nationally). Spending plummeted, to 3.4 percent, following the passage of Prop 13 in 1978, bumped along at roughly that level for 20 years before recovering in the dot-com years and falling again in the last four years.

The start of the fiscal year on Thursday found Schwarzenegger and Democratic leaders about 10 percent apart on spending for public schools.

According to the California Budget Project, California would have to raise $15. 3 billion more for K-12 schools to reach the national average of 4.25 percent. That’s three times the $5 billion difference between the $54 billion that Assembly Speaker John Perez and Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg are calling for in public school spending and what Schwarzenegger has proposed.

Democrats are calling for an extraction tax on oil and the rescission of corporate tax breaks the Legislature passed last year. So far, no Republicans have indicated they’d go along.

4 Comments

  1. “Reed Hastings (NetFlix CEO), speaking at a Rotary luncheon on April 15 [2009], told Rotarians that the typical private school’s tuition in our valley is near $15,000, which should give members of the audience, he said, an idea on how much it really costs to educate, with quality, one child in Silicon Valley.” — Joseph DiSalvo, “San Jose Inside.”

    http://www.sanjoseinside.com/news/entries/a_two_tiered_education_system/

    Hastings is an ultra-pro-charter multi-millonaire. He is a former state BOE president; a funder of NewSchools Venture Fund, Aspire Public Schools, Pacific Collegiate School, EdVoice, and Green Dot (whose Locke HS turnaround benefited from millions and millions); and member of Microsoft’s Board of Directors, so probably a buddy of Gates.

    The rich guys and members of the upper business class know exactly how much [money] it [a quality public education] would take but, so far, aren’t interested in advocating for the truth outside their private meetings with each other.

    Go figure that one out!

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  2. I would correct one point of Pondoora’s. Locke High School in LAUSD has not made a turnaround. Green Dot poured millions into campus upgrades and security, so the school is reportedly much nicer-looking and more peaceful — but its test scores have not, so far, improved at all under Green Dot’s privatized management. I agree that a nicer-looking and more peaceful school is a good thing, though, which is why public schools should also have enough money to provide adequate upgrades and security.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  3. I wonder if anyone has the stats on the “income side” comparison of education costs per tax payer. Perhaps California has more children, on average, per tax payer, making the tax burden higher than other states.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  4. Ray, although not an exact answer the US census bureau publishes poverty data. CA had a higher percentage of school age children living in poverty than 34 other states in 2008. So it’s a good guess CA combines greater need with less ability to pay per person. Although considering the concentration of wealth may show CA is better able to pay as a state.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

"Darn, I wish I had read that over again before I hit send.” Don’t let this be your lament. To promote a civil dialogue, please be considerate, respectful and mindful of your tone. We encourage you to use your real name, but if you must use a nom de plume, stick with it. Anonymous postings will be removed.

10.1Assessments(35)
2010 elections(16)
2012 election(14)
A to G Curriculum(25)
Achievement Gap(35)
Adequacy suit(19)
Advocacy organizations(20)
Blog info(4)
CALPADS(31)
Career academies(18)
CELDT(1)
Character education(2)
Charters(81)
Common Core standards(69)
Community Colleges(60)
Data(25)
Did You Know(16)
Disabilities education(3)
Dropout prevention(10)
Education Excellence Committee(15)
© Thoughts on Public Education 2012 | Home | Terms of Use | Site Map | Contact Us