With adoption of A-G, capable students like these will get courses they need

By Manny Barbara

The reporting on the East Side Union High School District’s adoption of the A-G default curriculum by my colleague John Fensterwald has certainly generated several responses. When I first advocated for this position, there were several similar responses from readers. One would think that the position that the board of trustees has taken is about to ruin a history of success in East Side. One East Side staff member spoke in another communication of “dooming these students to failure.” One blog response (with which several others agreed) is that this was a “wrong headed” decision. But it is important to note that these responses are opinions, not fact. There is no evidence that more students will fail in East Side as a result of adopting A-G. In fact, the experience in San Jose Unified was the opposite. The dropout rate did not increase and more students completed the A-G requirements. Furthermore, San Jose Unified required the A-G courses in order to graduate, and not just as default. In East Side, students will be able to opt out of A-G courses if deemed too difficult.

(By the way, one more time: The East Side policy does not “require” all students to take A-G coursework. But the burden of proof lies on others to show that a student should not take a class, and not the other way around. John appears to make that clear).

Now, the A-G policy is not the panacea for all student issues in East Side or anywhere else. Students who struggled because they were well below grade level will still do so unless they have additional help. Students will not miraculously find themselves at grade level in reading and math as a result. But allow me to share two real examples of students who would be helped by such a policy. Both students (who I will call Juan and Vito) are Hispanic students from my former district with whom I recently had contact.

Juan successfully passed geometry in grade 8. His mother, who I knew from my Hispanic Parent Committee, does not speak English very well but was involved in her son’s education. Juan was correctly placed in Algebra II in grade 9 as well as college prep English. But for some reason he found himself in study skills and general science. If it had been my child, a quick phone call to the guidance office would have corrected the problem. As it was, my chance meeting with his mother at a presentation, along with a helpful principal, took care of the change. He was appropriately placed in more rigorous classes, including grade 9 biology.  Juan will eventually go to college but perhaps in his junior year he will want the option of attending one of the more elite universities. In that case, the minimum A-G coursework will not do. He will be competing with students in districts where rigorous coursework begins in grade 9.

Vito was entering his senior year of high school this year and moved from East Side to San Jose Unified. He found himself short four A-G classes needed to graduate from San Jose Unified and took a more rigorous set of courses this year than he had intended. Since he intends to get a college degree, the increased rigor will benefit him in the long run. When I spoke to his mother, she was surprised that San Jose Unified had a more rigorous graduation requirement, and wondered why all districts do not have the same requirements for graduation. As a result of the transfer to San Jose Unified, one more Latino student will have completed the A-G coursework.

The A-G default (or required as in San Jose Unified) is not the magic solution for all students. But for students like the ones I just described it will make a difference. Rather than being doomed to failure, they will have something that so many other students take for granted: options for higher education.

Manny Barbara, former Superintendent of the Oak Grove School District, is VP of Advocacy and Thought Leadership for SVEF. He has been selected four times as Administrator of the Year by the Association of California School Administrators, and as Educator of the Year in 2008 by 100 Black Men of Santa Clara County. During his 10 years as superintendent, performance increased for all district student subgroups, including the number of students successfully completing algebra and geometry by the end of 8th grade.

4 Comments

  1. Manny,
     
    I appreciate your post. I also appreciate your bringing up the record of San Jose Unified, in the hope it may shed some light. What I appreciated a bit less (smile) is labellings the opposing comments as “opinions.” Indeed they are opinions, yet what you offer as your counterpoints are also opinions. This is not changed by your use  of a couple of anecdotes — many of the comments were also based on anecdotes, or or other district’s lessons (e.g., Algebra 1 in San Diego). Bottom line, blogs are mostly about opinions. (another smile)
     
    I personally feel that we mostly exhausted the subject based on the generally available facts. Eventually time will tell if this was a helpful decision by East Side Union. But, before I leave this subject, I cannot resist observing that after re-reading what was said here on this issue, and reading a bit more about the SJ Unified story, it is clear that the qualified success of San Jose Unified strongly depended on focused collaboration between teachers and administration, and between K-8 schools and high schools. The East Side Union situation seems rather weak on both points.
     
    Happy Thanksgiving!

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  2. I would also like to add that much of the stat’s being thrown around by San Jose Unified are “cooked” (dropouts, for example, are easily manipulated numbers by districts, since they can simply report them as “transfers,” and given there is no statewide system to track individual students, there’s no way to verify such claims).

    But here is a hard fact as reported by the UC’s own webpage: the proportion of San Jose Unified high school students enrolling in a UC has actually dropped since the district adopted the A-G mandate (just look at the number of students going to UC from the 6 high schools in existence in the year 2000 and compare the numbers to those going to UC from those same 6 schools in 2009 on the UC website, and one will see that it dropped from 10.8% of the students from these 6 schools down to 8.6%).

    I also have a lot of statistics countering SJUSD’s dropout claims, but I am reminded of the refrain: “There’s lies, damn lies, and then there’s statistics.”  And given the nature of online comments, I won’t bore you with that treatise, here.

    Thank you Ze’ev for your genuine and common-sensical responses  on this controvesial subject.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

Trackbacks

  1. Lots of ‘ifs’ in adopting A-G | Thoughts on Public Education

"Darn, I wish I had read that over again before I hit send.” Don’t let this be your lament. To promote a civil dialogue, please be considerate, respectful and mindful of your tone. We encourage you to use your real name, but if you must use a nom de plume, stick with it. Anonymous postings will be removed.

10.1Assessments(37)
2010 elections(16)
2012 election(16)
A to G Curriculum(27)
Achievement Gap(38)
Adequacy suit(19)
Adult education(1)
Advocacy organizations(20)
Blog info(5)
CALPADS(32)
Career academies(20)
CELDT(2)
Character education(2)
Charters(82)
Common Core standards(71)
Community Colleges(66)
Data(25)
Did You Know(16)
Disabilities education(3)
Dropout prevention(11)
© Thoughts on Public Education 2013 | Home | Terms of Use | Site Map | Contact Us