Brown consents to Race to Top

CORE districts apply, fingers crossed

With Gov. Brown’s signature, but not full support, the seven districts that led the state’s pursuit of Race to the Top money will meet today’s deadline for applying for the third – and perhaps last – round of the program. They’re hoping that U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and his top deputies won’t hold the governor’s reservations – or contrariness – against them.

California’s share of at least $49 million of the $200 million total should be all but assured, because this stage of Race to the Top is reserved for nine state finalists from the last round and  is more of an award than a competition. However, Brown, who two years ago wrote Duncan sharply criticizing  Race to the Top’s approach of “top down, Washington driven standardization,” is declining to give all of the commitments for reforms that Duncan is requiring – even though districts, acting independently, not the state, would be doing the work. Brown’s position could jeopardize the districts’ eligibility. Update: Here is thetwo-page letter, very deftly worded, that the state sent to Duncan today stating the limit of the state’s compliance with the Race to the Top requirements.**

California could learn as soon as Wednesday, according to Sue Burr, executive director for the State Board of Education. If the state qualifies, then the districts would have until mid-December to submit a plan detailing what they’ll do. That plan, which State Board of Education President Michael Kirst and Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson must sign as well, must also say how the districts will advance learning in  STEM (science, technology, engineering and math).

The seven unified districts, serving nearly 1 million children Los Angeles, San Francisco, Long Beach, Fresno, Sacramento City, Sanger, and Clovis – have formed the California Office to Reform Education to continue the cooperation they started in applying to Race to the Top last year, and are known as the CORE districts. But nearly 300 other districts and charter organizations signed on to the state’s application last time, too, and also could participate in the effort if they choose. So far, they haven’t been involved in the latest application.

Focus on Common Core, data

It’s taken weeks of negotiations and verbal jujitsu for the CORE districts to get to the point of possibly satisfying Brown’s reluctance and the feds’ demands. A letter that will go out today will detail the commitments, but according to Burr, CORE districts will agree to focus on two of the four broad areas of reform covered in the last round application: preparing for the implementation of the Common Core standards in math and English language arts and creating data sharing to enable the Race to the Top districts to collaborate.

What Brown won’t sign on to are the other two pledges:

  • That the state agrees to continue the four strategies for turning around failing schools, whose effectiveness he has questioned;
  • That the state will continue teacher and principal effectiveness strategies that include using evaluations incorporating student test data. The California Teachers Assn., a key Brown ally, staunchly opposes this.

The feds aren’t requiring that the CORE districts work on all four; to the contrary, because the third-round grants are less than a tenth the size – $49 million compared with potentially $700 million, had it won Round Two – California and other states have been directed  to narrow their scope. However, the feds still want the states to affirm their commitment to all reform areas.

California is distinct among the finalist states in that a district collaborative is driving the application. So CORE is hoping the feds will cut it some slack. Its position is that the districts are continuing to work on all reforms, including teacher evaluations. As far as they’re concerned, nothing has changed since Round Two, according to Hilary McLean, communications director for CORE .

“We’re excited to move forward,” she said. “Race to the Top will accelerate the work that the districts have committed to do.”

The benefits from Race to the Top, including their work creating a data bank of formative assessments for Common Core, will be available to all districts.

“It would be a travesty for California not to seek the money,” she said, since it’s California’s to lose.

Whatever the governor’s philosophical misgivings, it would have been odd for Brown not to give the OK. He and Torlakson have cited the lack of state money as the reason the state cannot meet the federal requirements for a waiver from the No Child Left Behind law. Preparing for Common Core is one of those unfunded costs (Torlakson put it at at least $600 million, a very high figure). Furthermore, Brown has questioned the value of state-based teacher and student databases, saying data systems should be designed locally with information useful to teachers. That’s what the CORE districts plan to do with some of the Race to the Top dollars.

The other eight finalists are Colorado, Louisiana, South Carolina, Kentucky, Arizona, Illinois, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. South Carolina has said it won’t be applying, leaving its share of $12.25 million to be divvied up among California and the other states. The others likewise may be sharpening their knives, hoping California’s application is a turkey.

** Here is the key paragraph: “The state remains committed to adopting and implementing college and career-ready standards and high-quality assessments, improving the collection and use of data at the local level, increasing teacher effectiveness and equity in the distribution of effective teachers in a manner that is determined locally, and turning around the state’s lowest achieving schools. It cannot afford to implement these reforms statewide, though, nor can it compel Local Education Agencies (LEAs) to implement them. Numerous LEAs are prepared, however, to implement several of the reforms as described below as part of the Race to the Top Round Three application.”


  1. Thanks for the update John.  So CTA won’t agree to support the evaluations, etc., yet teachers in some very large districts do support the Race to the Top application, including local evaluations, data sharing …
    California teachers and CTA really have some serious talking to do. Does CTA really speak for all teachers – I certainly didn’t agree with a lot of what was said when I was a teacher – or should there be a clear organization for those teachers who didn’t agree with AB 114, who do favour evaluations and merit pay? 
    Endless polarization doesn’t seem to be getting CA anywhere!

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  2. Why do we bother. It feels like the scene where Lucy holds the ball for Charlie Brown to kick and pulls it away at the last minute. CA has applied repeatedly, at the behest of Duncan, only to be denied. All the while seem to pass one bad piece of legislation after another in a (pointless) attempt to appease Duncan.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity


  1. Race To The Top Adds School Districts To U.S. Education Competition | Screw Cable
  2. Race To The Top Adds School Districts To U.S. Education Competition | WestPenn Journal
  3. Race To The Top 2012 Invites School Districts To Compete | Education News
  4. Race To The Top 2012 Invites School Districts To Compete | Education QA
  5. Race to the Top opens up to districts | Thoughts on Public Education

"Darn, I wish I had read that over again before I hit send.” Don’t let this be your lament. To promote a civil dialogue, please be considerate, respectful and mindful of your tone. We encourage you to use your real name, but if you must use a nom de plume, stick with it. Anonymous postings will be removed.

2010 elections(16)
2012 election(16)
A to G Curriculum(27)
Achievement Gap(38)
Adequacy suit(19)
Adult education(1)
Advocacy organizations(20)
Blog info(5)
Career academies(20)
Character education(2)
Common Core standards(71)
Community Colleges(66)
Did You Know(16)
Disabilities education(3)
Dropout prevention(11)
© Thoughts on Public Education 2015 | Home | Terms of Use | Site Map | Contact Us