Adult education’s existential crisis
Need to “hunker down” and fightThis is the second of a two-part series on adult education in California. Click here to read part 1.
Adult education in California is nearly as old as the state itself. Today, the program that has helped millions of people learn English, earn a GED, and receive job training for 156 years is facing extinction. A new report released today by EdSource concludes that these schools, which provide second chances for the state’s most needy adults, “are as much at-risk as many of the people they serve.”
The report, aptly titled At Risk: Adult Schools in California, surveyed the state’s 30 largest school districts and found that 23 had made significant cuts to their adult education programs. In many cases, they lost at least half their funding. One of them, Anaheim Union High School District, shuttered its 73-year-old adult school.
“The important thing to remember is that these adult school programs are serving a population that really falls through the cracks,” said Louis Freedberg, Executive Director of EdSource. “This is a population that needs basic education in basic skills, that needs help with English as a Second Language, and for whom there is really no other place to go to get these basic services.”
These draconian cuts have taken place in just the past three years. Until 2009, adult education funding was protected as a categorical program, meaning districts could not use the money for any other purpose. But that February, faced with a massive budget shortfall, the Legislature and Gov. Brown removed 39 programs – including adult ed – from this restriction and gave school districts flexibility to use the funds wherever they were most needed.
A survey of several hundred school districts conducted by the adult education program in Montebello Unified School District found that about 40 have closed or are planning to shut their adult education programs, and estimated that, statewide, districts have redirected about 60 percent of the $773 million in adult education funds to the K-12 system. At the same time, enrollment dropped from 1.2 million students to about 700,000.
“We were actually growing before the cuts started,” said Pam Garramone, principal of Sonoma Valley Adult School, which closes at the end of this month. Garramone said there were six adult school agencies in Sonoma County before flex started; now there’s only one, Petaluma, and it doesn’t have the capacity to accommodate the 10,000 people who have been shut out.
Garramone said her district has always been very supportive of adult education, but was placed in an untenable position. “Our budget situation was just so drastic that every single thing that was on the list to be cut was painful for them, and they’re looking at even more cuts next year, so the decision to finally close adult education they just felt had to be made,” she said. “And I really don’t blame them; I didn’t necessarily agree with it, but I certainly don’t blame them for the decision.”
She blames the Legislature. Adult education should never have been flexed, said Garramone. Even though categorical flex is supposed to end on June 30, 2015, few people expect to see the money again. Indeed, Gov. Brown’s proposal for a weighted student funding formula would make categorical flexibility permanent.
Paul Hay, the superintendent of San Jose’s Metropolitan Education District (MetroED), told EdSource if weighted student funding is approved, “adult education is dead, gone, over, and will never come back in the state.”
MetroED’s enrollment plunged from 10,000 to 2,000 after it closed more than 50 programs, two major campuses, and all its community outreach centers except for a program for disabled adults.
Societal impact
The adult education program in Oakland Unified School District was among the hardest hit without being closed. It has been cut by more than 90 percent since the start of flex, losing $11 million of a $12 million budget which necessitated shutting two campuses and canceling English as a second language courses as well as its high school credit recovery program. The GED classes are still thriving, however, and graduated 95 students last year.
“When we were cut our numbers were at the highest they’ve been, this would have been our best year ever,” said Chris Nelson, director of the district’s adult education programs and president of the California Council for Adult Education. “It’s ironic now that the economy is so bad because it’s during times of high unemployment that people seek education programs.”
Donita McKay is studying for her GED and taking a computer literacy course through Oakland’s adult education school. McKay is 49 years old, a single mom with four children, and a ninth-grade drop out. She said being back in school has opened her mind and given her a different outlook on life.
“Education is important because when you don’t have it you’re so limited,” said McKay. “I always tell my children, get your education, because I didn’t really get all mine, so and you see where I’m at. They hear that from my mouth everyday.”
Sitting at small workstation in an RV retrofitted as mobile computer classroom, McKay said she’s considering becoming a teacher one day, “because I always like to give back and give what I learned, because it reminds me I used to be like that.”
Oakland has all the challenges of any big city. English is not the first language for about 40 percent of the population and in some neighborhoods the high school dropout rate is a staggering 60 to 70 percent, said Mayor Jean Quan, who spent twelve years on the local school board.
“What I really worry about is California creating a permanent underclass,” said Quan. “This is one of the ways out; this is one of the second chances that people have, and if people don’t have at least a high school degree it’s very hard to even get a good paying blue-collar job.”
Not dead yet
Gordon Jackson is head of the Adult Education Division of the California Department of Education. He said the mission of adult education is to advance the “economic, workforce development and societal goals by preparing adult learners for college, career and civic responsibility.”
It’s a critical goal, but one that doesn’t have critical support. Although adult education programs are run by both K-12 school districts and community colleges, it’s not the core mission of either. So, it’s taken some time for advocates to organize, but they’ve started considering alternatives on a number of fronts.
Several proposals are being floated said EdSource’s Freedberg. One idea is to combine resources and establish regional centers. Another, put forth by the state’s Little Hoover Commission, recommends turning over responsibility for adult education to community college; even thought they
are facing their own massive budget cuts. And a third plan, already underway, is to lobby the Legislature to remove adult education from categorical flex and from the governor’s weighted student funding formula.
“There are times when I would like to sit next to somebody at Starbucks and moan and groan and say I cannot believe that there are adults in this world of ours at the legislative level and other places who don’t really understand what it means to demolish an infrastructure, what it means to do this to California’s future,” said Jackson. “I can bemoan that and have a really intense pity party for a while, until I need to focus on what needs to happen.”












“I cannot believe that there are adults in this world of ours at the legislative level and other places who don’t really understand what it means to demolish an infrastructure, what it means to do this to California’s future.”
Those adults aren’t legislators, but rather, voters and taxpayers, who demand excellent services but refuse, over and over again, to fund them.
I agree that adult education is vital. It is one of the silliest things to cut in bad economic times. I like the regionalization solution because it taps economies of scale. Isn’t this what has happened with the Regional Occupational Program (ROP) in many locales? Shifting jurisdiction over adult education, and adult ed.’s historical share of the K-12 funding envelope, to community colleges would also seem to make sense. Different credit structures (high school versus lower-division undergraduate) could be problematic, though.
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
As a former Career/Tech Ed (ROP) Teacher, I have personally witnessed the slow demise of these programs, with the final blow dealt by categorical program flexes. While I’m VERY sorry to see these programs eliminated at high school campuses (even as the President espouses the very real need for them at the high school level), one COULD make a cogent argument that they should rightfully reside on Junior College campuses. With some creative collaboration between High School and Junior College leadership, these programs COULD still be offered to high school students, through concurrent enrollment policies that would solve the Class-credit issues. And adults COULD access these programs at the Jr. College Level…
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
I am a firm believer in lifetime learning, however the current fiscal crisis is an opportune time to address this issue. Adult Education programs belong in the Community College system, with appropriate integration that allows high school students access as necessary.
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
And what exactly is Mr. Gordon Jackson’s salary to assist these people?
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
So are people suggesting that some of the flex money be taken from k12 and given to community colleges?
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
Not at all, that was not the intent of my comment. We have a commingled system of funding that needs to be unbundled. Adults are adults and seems to me would be best handled at the community college level within existing funding levels as determined by the flawed Prop 98. That leaves high school students. If within the school day, concurrent enrollment, and if outside of the school day, then exclusively within the community college portion of Prop 98.
The system (K-14) needs to injected with additional funding, made simpler and more transparent. Unfortunately, neither of the proposed tax initiatives address these issues.
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
Thanks for the clarification. I was just making sure moving the task to community colleges wasnt somehow seen somehow as a ’solution’ given the lack of funding for the program wherever it exists (in fact, moving it to flex explicitly removes that funding, imho).
IMHO, Munger’s plan is much simpler. In theory it will also be more transparent, but this relies on the schools being on the ball (I believe it is more transparent than the current funding regardless). It is true it does nothing for community colleges, but it does provide funding for 0-12 (ie 0-3 and pre-k as well as k-12). And as long as prop98 continues to exist, it will act as ‘additional funding’ assuming no extreme shenanigans by the leg and gov…
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
At first glance, it seems best served by the community college system, but when you dig into the success stories, you also see that by affiliating programs with the K-12 schools, the parents become more tightly bound into their children’s education and into the school community, which is valuable both as a way to reach them and to get them participating in their local school. Of course, this is only interesting when they are parents or recent high school students.
I think there is value in making this a funded, standalone program out of the community colleges, but probably some partnership with the K-12 schools would still be desirable.
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
Those that advocate having community colleges do the work of the adult programs do not seem to realize that community colleges are just that , colleges. The students entering college should not be ESL learners nor should they need to have to work on their high school diplomas. The community colleges do not have the resources, nor the funding to take up these tasks. Additionally, the value of the adult programs in many cases is their accessibility to members of the community. These classes are brought to localities far from community college campuses. CTE classes may be a different story if the community colleges have the resources to provide them to students.
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity
I agree with Joel. The curriculum for adult ed ESL is life skills and civics based. Whereas, the community college curriculum is academic based (except in a few districts where there is no adult ed). Adult ed in California is charged with preparing ESL and GED students for jobs, career training or higher education.
Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity