Compromise on school fees bill

Passage would end litigation by ACLU
By

Advocates of a complaint process for parents and students who believe they’re being charged illegal fees have amended a bill to satisfy all of the main opponents, save the silent one who hasn’t been heard from yet. That’s Gov. Jerry Brown, who vetoed similar legislation last year.

On Wednesday, the Senate Education Committee approved AB 1575 without opposition, and changes that were made to the bill may smooth its way through the Senate and on to Brown’s desk. One factor could motivate him to sign it this year: Doing so would settle a lawsuit against the state that the state is likely to lose.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California is pushing the bill that Assemblymember Ricardo Lara (D-South Gate) is sponsoring for the second straight year. Two years ago, the ACLU filed a class action lawsuit against the state after discovering, through an informal investigation, that dozens of school districts were charging students for textbooks, lab materials, Advanced Placement test fees, and sports uniforms. Students who couldn’t afford them were sometimes publicly humiliated.

The ACLU based its lawsuit on the state Constitution’s guarantee of “a system of common schools by which a free school shall be kept up and supported in each district…” In the 1984 decision Hartzell v. Connell, the state Supreme Court explicitly prohibited charges and fees for school programs. Former Gov. Schwarzenegger wanted to resolve the lawsuit, and the judge in Los Angeles County Superior Court agreed to put it on hold while a bill encoding the fees ban into statute and establishing a reimbursement process went through the Legislature in 2011.

Last year, in vetoing AB 165, Brown wrote that “this bill takes the wrong approach.” It would “mandate that every single classroom in California post a detailed notice and that all 1,042 school districts and over 1,200 charter schools follow specific complaint, hearing, and audit procedures, even where there have been no complaints, let alone evidence of any violation. This goes too far.”

Lara’s new amended bill drops some of the requirements that groups like the Association of California School Administrators and the California Association of School Business Officials considered onerous.

The requirement of posting a notice of the prohibition on fees in every classroom remains. So does the complaint process, which is based on the procedures in the settlement of the Williams lawsuit protecting low-income children, requiring textbooks in every classroom, qualified teachers in every school, and clean, safe facilities. Parents who believe they are being charged illegally can file a complaint to their principal, who can resolve it or refer the matter to the district office, which has a month to reimburse and settle. If not, the parent can forward the complaint to the state Department of Education for a determination and order to reimburse. CDE’s estimated cost of administering the process is $350,000 per year.

Gone from the bill are provisions that appeared to involve state mandates: a requirement that districts verify early in the school year to make sure no fees are being charged in any school, an audit provision at the end of the school year, and the imposition of a fine on districts that fail to comply with the reimbursements.

Meanwhile, the lawsuit is moving forward again, according to Brooks Allen, director of education advocacy for the ACLU of Southern California. The Brown administration took the position that blame for illegal fees lies with the districts, not the state. But in January, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Carl West ruled that the state can’t slough off its responsibility to enforce children’s right to a free public education.

That decision may serve to temper Brown’s inclination, if he has it, to veto Lara’s bill again.

Note to readers: This is the last piece I’ll be posting on TOP-Ed. On Monday, co-writer Kathy Baron and I will start work at EdSource, where we will continue writing daily on California education issues while joining EdSource’s talent staff to expand our coverage. To learn more about the move and the future of TOP-Ed, please go here.

7 Comments

  1. Sure wish the bill also addressed deceptive fundraising requests, which will rise with the decline of school fees.
     
    Pacific Collegiate Charter School “request” a “donation” of $3,000 per student, per year in heavy handed letters, followed by collection calls from staff and parents, followed by personal letters from the principal to families who have not “donated” or delivered on their pledge to donate.  Nice, eh?
     
    It gets better. In their appeals, they tell parents that they need that $3,000 to make up the “shortfall in funding” from the state for daily educational expenses to serve their 480 students. The problem is, they have not spent those donations on students. Those funds have gone straight into the bank, where they now sit in a tidy pile comprising an 85% cash reserve.
     
    Their latest fun move is to set up a separate private foundation to run a capital campaign to buy land to construct a mega-campus. The seed money for that capital campaign? The cash reserves. Made up of funds extorted from parents under false pretenses AND our public tax dollars, co-mingled for the past 12 years.
     
    Who’s going to write the bill that addresses this fraud?

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  2. Rocklin Academy Charter policy requires parents to volunteer 30 hours.  If they cannot serve the time, there is an opt out for $25/hour unserved.  Would this be covered by AB 1575?

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  3. It’s incredible that there has been so many cuts in education in California . While the cuts look devastating . There not . It’s that the school districts that cry cuts are the same ones that are cutting classified staff and hiring more management positions .
     
    There is lots of Money in Public Education , raising taxes  to keep administrators in their seats should be voted no.

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  4. As bags of humans army into the stadium[url=http://www.authenticnikebroncosjersey.com/broncos_von_miller_jersey_nike-c-9_21.html]Von Miller Red Jersey[/url]
    the NFL money authoritative industry-tickets and commodity are absolutely money spinners Right here NFL Tops arrive upon auction offer
    Finding cheap MLB jerseys to buy is one of the chief concerns for anybody looking to get their hands on some merchandise from their favorite team Jerseys make you really feel proud especially should you currently wear what you purchased

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

  5. Governor Brown may be wise to veto an otherwise reasonable bill. The lawsuit claiming the state is liable if a school charges for an AP test fee by mistake or requests donations to cover an unbudgeted expense (for example) will give rise to so many petty suits. It will force the state to payout small settlements that add up (5-10 k$ each – like accident claims – 1/3). This has to be resolved; unless high income for third-rate lawyers is the goal of educational dollars.
     

    Report this comment for abusive language, hate speech and profanity

Trackbacks

  1. The Educated Guess: Compromise on school fees bill : SCOE News Reader

"Darn, I wish I had read that over again before I hit send.” Don’t let this be your lament. To promote a civil dialogue, please be considerate, respectful and mindful of your tone. We encourage you to use your real name, but if you must use a nom de plume, stick with it. Anonymous postings will be removed.

10.1Assessments(37)
2010 elections(16)
2012 election(16)
A to G Curriculum(27)
Achievement Gap(38)
Adequacy suit(19)
Adult education(1)
Advocacy organizations(20)
Blog info(5)
CALPADS(32)
Career academies(20)
CELDT(2)
Character education(2)
Charters(82)
Common Core standards(71)
Community Colleges(66)
Data(25)
Did You Know(16)
Disabilities education(3)
Dropout prevention(11)
© Thoughts on Public Education 2014 | Home | Terms of Use | Site Map | Contact Us